Israel admits to an image crisis

Israel admits to an image crisis

By newsadmin at 15 July, 2009, 9:38 am

Jason Koutsoukis, Jerusalem
ISRAELI Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s communications chief, Ron Dermer, has admitted that Israel faces a serious public relations problem.

In his first interview since the Netanyahu Government took office in March, the Prime Minister’s director of policy planning and communications has told The Age that it’s time Israel switched its PR strategy from defence to offence.

“We have to break out of the straitjacket,” Mr Dermer says. “We have to defend our own right to defend ourselves. It’s not for other people to do it for us.”

Despite launching a broadside at the way the foreign media and other organisations report events in Israel, Mr Dermer acknowledged that successive Israeli governments were also to blame for presenting a narrow argument.

“It is not enough for Israel to say that it wants peace. You must also say that you are not a thief. We did not steal another people’s land. That is the core of this conflict,” he says.

Six months after Israel launched a 22-day offensive in the besieged Gaza Strip that killed more than 1400 Palestinians, the country has faced one of the worst public relations crises in its 61-year history.

In the last week alone, Israel has been forced to defend itself against harsh criticisms in reports published by the Red Cross, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

Revelations that French President Nicolas Sarkozy had pressured Mr Netanyahu to dump his Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, because he was an embarrassment to Israel caused more headaches.

“I could go on for another half an hour,” says Yigal Palmor, spokesman for Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Bar-Ilan University professor Eytan Gilboa, Israel’s leading public diplomacy expert, says Israel will have to spend 10 times its current PR budget if it really wants to change international perceptions.

“We need to be spending $US100 million ($A124.7 million) a year on information campaigns abroad — primarily in Arab countries and then in Europe, where there is a complete lack of knowledge of what Israel is and what Israel does,” Professor Gilboa says.

The power to persuade and shape understandings, what he calls “soft power”, is a concept that Israeli governments have never properly understood.

“In terms of power, a properly organised information campaign can be worth several brigades,” Professor Gilboa says.

Modern media tools like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, must also become part of a properly organised public diplomacy arsenal.

Others disagree, rejecting the notion that Israel’s image abroad is the issue.

“I think Israel has a policy problem, not a PR problem,” says Uri Dromi, who was director of Israel’s Government Press Office under former prime minister Yitzhak Rabin.

“The biggest problem is that Israel should not be in the (occupied) West Bank in the first place. Who cares what people write about us?”

With the new Government’s basic policy framework laid down, Mr Dermer, an American-born Israeli who has worked closely with Mr Netanyahu over the past decade, says his main focus will nonetheless be on what Israelis call “hasbara” — a word that roughly translates as “explanation”.

In pursuing a strategy that will centralise the Israeli Government’s responses to issues raised by the foreign media into a kind of war room, and make better use of public opinion research, Mr Dermer says Israel has to start shaming those countries and organisations that hold Israel to a different standard.

“(People) who get together to call for a boycott against Israel, are they also calling for a boycott against North Korea, the world’s largest concentration camp? Against Iran, where they hang homosexuals?” Mr Dermer asks. “When you hold Israel to a standard that you won’t hold another country to, what are you doing? You are being anti-Semitic.”

Mr Dermer says the combined narratives of Israel as a Jewish state, the importance of Jerusalem to the Jewish, Christian and Islamic faiths, and the Middle East’s tremendous oil reserves make a compelling world story that Israel must try to influence.

“Within this story is this narrative that has grown much stronger in recent years that is essentially false: people who see us as colonialist invaders.

“But once the Palestinians accept that we, the Jews, are here by right, that we are not foreign colonialists and we’re not invaders — even if they say it (the land) is 1 per cent yours and 99 per cent ours — then we’re in real negotiations.”



Related posts:

  1. Israel Admits Harvesting Palestinian Organs
  2. Israel to US: We reserve ‘right’ to bomb Iran
  3. Israel-US relations at Risk on IRAN, differences growing

Categories : Articles | Politics | World News

Comments
ali July 19, 2009

The ignorant, arrogant, muderous minded israeli establishment doesnt need anything else but a dose of REAL holocaust,, not the fake one british historians created for jews in world war 2. Only then will they know the pain of genocide, which they are afflicting on paletinian people for no onther reason then to show the world how defiant they can be and get away with it, only because they are the favourite lapdogs of sole super power of the world.

Intelligent July 19, 2009

@ali
Well a security state cannot last for long and when there’s so much tyranny involved.

I think I also have read some article of CIA predicting the fall of Israel in 20 years.

Americans won’t be able to save them for long, Americans will have to look after their own ASSs at the moment and in a next few years Americans will totally abandon Israel for their own good.

Israel isn’t a strategic asset anymore for Americans,,, Iran or India may well be the next Israels in the making.

Iran is almost changing from within and soon we’ll see a revolutionary change.

ali July 19, 2009

C.I.A predictions are hogwash,,, why?? because they have been predicting/wishing fall of pakistan since more then 2 decades. C.i.a’s declaration is only to either gain some leverage on israel’s establishment which is totaly out of control or to gain some arab/muslim sympathies for admitting israel’s terrorism. But one thing IS true,, that no country or state can stay long on the face of world who are not only intolerant of others around them but they spite every breath of every living being.. Ultimately they are consumed by the fire of their on being. That is whats gonna happen to israel and other states/people whose hate of other ethnicities/nations is well known.

Intelligent July 19, 2009

And what do you say about this IRAN thing?

ali July 19, 2009

Iran is considered as a threat by few,, everyone of these “few” have their own reasons. But iam sure there is no comparison between iran and israel when it comes to being the ‘ultimate threat to the unity and peace of the world” . Israel by its deeds of defying of international laws is giving us a peek of what Realy lies beneath the veil of innocent evil.

Shabbir Ali July 19, 2009

@ Ali

Dont you know engouh about Iran !, IRAN is the agent of Isreal and USA as well, to prove my statement I would say that since 1978 there is a War of Words between Israel, USA and Iran, and not yet USA or Israel attacked on Iran, on the other hand USA attacked / invaded Iraq even UN Inspectors declared that there are no WMD in Iraq but USA and his allies attack on IRAQ by considering their first Enemy and same happened with Afghanistan.

So Iran is an agent who is working for the interests of USA and Israel and engaged in to de-stabilize Islamic Countries by his paid groups, their first target is to destabilize Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. I hope you will try to understand these ememies of Islam.

Zaidi July 19, 2009

Both Israil & Iran are the enemy of Muslim Ummah

Leave a comment


Comments need to be approved and may take a while to appear.