Reality Behind Karbala Story
By guestwriter at 27 December, 2009, 4:03 am
By Moulana Muhammad Akra, Chakwal . Paid Article
The incident of Karbala is one of the most tragic events in the history of Islam. Its victims were no ordinary people; but were the illustrious descendents of the Holy Prophet (SAW). They were the inheritors of his superb conduct and the custodians of prophetic lights.
Hadhrat Amir Muawiyah (RAU) died on 22nd Rajab 60 AH and during his 19 years rule both Hadhrat Hassan and Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) had no complaint against him. Even Shias confess this fact as mentioned by Abu Jaffir Toosi in his `Talkhees-e-Shaakr (P:9)
“No body disputes that Hadhrat Hassan (RAU) abdicated in favour of Hadhrat Amir Muawiyah (RAU), took oath of allegiance with him and thereafter kept receiving gifts and grants from him”.
This only means that Hadhrat Hassan (RAU) had willingly handed over the Government to him. According to `Manaqib Shehr Bin Aashob’(4:33)
“Hadhrat Hassan (RAU) got an undertaking from Amir Mauwiyah (RAU) to grant him 50 thousand Dirhams annually, thus the arrangement was made.”
Hadhrat Hassan (RAU) left Kufa and settled in Medina against the wishes of Kufi chieftains. Some of them were very annoyed and went to visit him in Medina. In a frenzy of anger and frustration, one of their leaders Suleman bin Surd, thus greeted Hadhrat Hassan (RAU): “Peace be upon you, 0 the disgracer of believers”. He replied ” I am not the disgracer, but I am the one to give them honour, I have saved the people from discord and bloodshed”. Having been disappointed from him, they tried to provoke Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) but according to ‘Akhbar-ul-Tawwar by Abu Hanifa Dinori, he replied:
“We have taken an oath of allegiance and there is no cogent reason to break it.”
Consequently, this conspiracy was temporarily subdued and the caliphate of Hadhrat Amir Muawiyah (RAU) turned out to be a period of internal stability and external conquests. Major part of North Africa, Afghanistan and North Western Frontier Province were also conquerred. Constantinople (Istanbul), was besieged once again. Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) personally participated in this campaign during which a renowned Companion Hadhrat Abu Ayub Ansari (RAU) died and was laid to rest beside the city wall. Other renowned Companions like Hadhrat Abdullah bin Umar and Hadhrat Abdullah bin Zubair (RAU) also took part in this siege. Hadhrat Amir Muawiyah (RAU) was the first ruler to employ an armada for maritime crusades and was intact the founder of the Muslim naval fleet.
When Yazid succeeded his father Hadhrat Muawiyah (RAU), Hadhrat Hussain and Abdullah bin Zubair (RAU) did not take oath of allegiance with him and moved out of Medina to settle in Makkah. There is no evidence of any conspiracy in the ensuing four months of Shaaban, Ramadhan, Shiwal and Zi`qad. Tibri reports that both of them offered their prayers together in the Ka’aba and were often seen there.
The news of Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) not taking an oath of allegiance with Yazid was a boon for the Kufis and their mischievous nature immediately urged them out of subdued perfidy. Perchance the Governor of Kufa, Hadhrat Nu’man Bin BashirAnsari (RAU) was an extremely pious and simple person. Taking undue advantage of this, an uprising was fomented by the Kufis. According to `Tibri’, the Kufis wrote to Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) that Yazid had forcibly extracted the oath of allegiance from them but they all looked towards him and had not joined the Governor in the congregational Friday prayers. They implored him to come to their rescue. Three Kufi delegations called on him in succession at Makkah. He returned the first two, but the third was carrying letters from the Kufis beseeching him to respond to their call, failing which, he would bear the burden of blame before the Holy Prophet (SAW) on the Day of Judgment. Hadhrat Hussain (RAU), therefore, decided to dispatch his cousin Muslim Bin Aqueel (RAU) to Kufa to ascertain the truth of those letters, before a final decision.
Hadhrat Muslim (RAU) reached Kufa via Medina and stayed with Bin Ausja. People gathered in large numbers to take the oath of allegiance with him. When their number exceeded twelve thousand, he shifted to Arwah Bin Muravi and sent a word to Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) urging him to reach Kufa. Soon after the departure of the messenger, the situation, however, took a dramatic turn. Nu’man Bin Bashir Ansari was replaced by Abdullah Bin Ziyad as Governor of Kufa. These events are described in great detail in `Tibri’. The new Governor narrowly escaped an attempt on his life. He then summoned the chiefs of various tribes and threatened them with dire consequences. As a result they all turned back on their words and Hadhrat Muslim (RAU) was completely forsaken. No body was prepared to afford him refuge, guide him or even talk to him. He was arrested and killed. Before his arrest, he wrote down all these events and entrusted the document to Umar Bin Sa’ad Bin Ahi Waqqas, who held a high office and was closely related with both Hadhrat Muslim and Hadhrat Hussain (RAU). He dispatched the document to Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) who had already left for Kufa alongwith him family. Most of the Companions including Abu Saeed Khudri, Wasla ul Laiti and his close relatives like Abdullah Bin Abbas and Abdullah Bin Jaffar Tayyar (his cousin and brother-in- law), tried in vain to dissuade him from undertaking this journey. Although they agreed with him in principle but were apprehensive about the wavering loyalty of the Kufis. At that time, almost everyone including the Companions had pledged their loyalty to Yazid. Out of the notables, only Hadhrat Abdullah Bin Zubair and Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) had declined to do so. The latter had contended that either Yazid should satisfy the masses from whom the pledge had forcibly been extracted or else should resign in favour of someone acceptable to all the Muslims. This was indeed the correct point of view. It was basically a political dispute which Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) wanted to settle amicably. It was neither a war between Muslim nor the infidels nor did the opposing factions brand each other as non believers. The opinion of his dissuaders was based on an apprehension about the Kufis designs and they could discern the conspiracy underlying the Kufi invitation. Later events proved them right.
Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) left Makkah for Kufa in Zilhaj 60 AH. The Shi’ites quotes the date as 8th Zilhaj, exactly the date on which the pilgrims go to Mina from Makkah to perform obligatory Hajj rituals. It implies that even after staying four months in Makkah, Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) did not perform Hajj and left on its exact date. There was apparently no hurry to forego the Hajj. There was no emergency in Kufa. People were reportedly flocking to his side in large numbers and pledging loyalty to him at the hands of Hadhrat Muslim (RAU). Whether he actually left Makkah on that date or not is an altogether different issue, but the Shi’ites must have him in Karbala on first of Muharram, to enact their ten days long drama. Karbala is located at a distance of twenty two way stations from Makkah and it was not possible then to stay at any other place except a proper way station, especially when accompanied by the family. The Shia historians, however, put him on road without performing Hajj and make him cover one way station on each of the 22 days, an impossible task for the women and children, though `Tibri’ (Vol 4 Page 197) reports that he left Makkah after performing Hajj.
That exactly is the dilemma in which the Shia find themselves. Had Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) performed Hajj, he would have completed the rituals by 14 Zilhajj and would hardly be able to set out on his fateful journey before 15th. That way, with some rest at atleast one or two of the way stations, he would just be able to reach Karbala on 10th of Muharram and be slain the same day. The Shia historians find it impossible to accommodate all their concocted fables in only one day, for which even ten days are considered insufficient by them. But this is their problem and not that of Hadhrat Hussain (RAU). He actually performed Hajj and in that universal congregation of the Muslims, neither declared any war against Yazid nor invited any one to accompany him to Kufa. Otherwise, many Muslims would have definitely responded to the call of the grand son of the Holy Prophet (SAW). In fact, he did not set out for any campaign at all. Who would, otherwise take his family including children and infants to war without any military preparations? He actually intended to reside at Kufa where he owned a house and mend the prevalent situation. The other reason for this journey was the persistent invitation of the Kufis. In case the Government was able to satisfy the Kufis, he had no dispute with it; otherwise he was justified to accept their leadership.
Enroute he received the last letter written by Hadhrat Muslim (RAU) alongwith the news of his slaughter. After consulting his companions he decided to continue. He appreciated that his personal presence in Kufa would assign an entirely different orientation to the situation. It was equally important to ascertain the circumstances leading to the murder of Hadhrat Muslim (RAU) and to trace the culprits. He also wanted to meet those Kufis who had originally invited him. In any case, his intention had been to take up permanent residence in his house in Kufa.
Now let us have a look at the map (on opposite page), depicting his fateful journey.
The names of successive way stations on Makkah – Kufa
Damascus routes are given below:.
1. Bustaan-e-Amar 12. Al-Haajez
2. Zaat-e-lraq 13. Sumera
3. Al-Ghamra 14. Toz
4. Al-Musleh 15. Feed
5. Umemia 16. Saalba
6. Al-Amq 17. Ashqooq
7. Sulela 18. Zubala
8. Madden bin Salem 19. lqaa
9. Rabzeh 20. Uqbah
10. Mughenatul-Maawan 21. Waqsah
11. Maadan Nuqra 22. Al-Aura
MAKKAH
REALITY BEHIND KARBALA STORY
(Part- II)
The event of Karbala is so deeply shrouded in the mystery of fabricated tales given religious sanctity that nobody has ever ventured to analyse it objectively. No one has even bothered to know about the topography of the area. The town of Karbala is located on a river bank at a height of 700-1700 feet. The ground is sandy but green with small rocky hillocks on one side. The place was also called Al-Lutf, meaning a pleasure place. The story of denying the river water to Hadhrat Hussain’s (RAU) caravan is incredible because if you dig here to pitch a tent, subsoil water gushes up. What then was the need of fetching water from the river? Shias themselves report that Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) tried to dig with a spade but water came out, he refilled it and decided to get water from the river only. The same reporters later state that he went and begged for water from the troops, carrying a small child in his arms. It all appears absurd.
Anyway, Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) broke journey to take some rest on 10th Muharram. Strange enough, most of the Kufis of the armed contingent offered their prayers with him. Many joined him for Zuhr prayers in Karbala. He again talked to them about their abrupt behaviour and said: “You are strange people; first you invited me but later joined Yazid. Even that could be condoned but what right do you have now to block my way”? When they again denied giving written any letters, he sent for the bags containing thousands and poured them out in a heap. About one hundred and fifty of these letters bore the signatures of several persons on the margins. These facts are contained in Shi’ite book Khulasa-tul-Masaib (p :50). On their return to the camp, the news of the letters reached other Kufi leaders and they immediately discerned the sequel of their visit to Damascus. They knew fully well that Yazid could not afford to eliminate Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) because that would amount to his own destruction. But when he would know the conspiracy, the consequences could very easily be realized. On the other hand, if they killed Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) right there, they would be able to destroy that documentary evidence against them and the entire responsibility would fall on Yazid. That would generate a wave of anger against him in the entire Islamic world and he would not be in a position to take revenge from them. This consideration drove them to storm the camp of Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) before Asr prayers. They trampled the entire camp which had a handful of his servants, sons, nephews, some of the Kufis and Hur (who had deserted the Kufis after seeing the letters). All these pious souls were treacherously and mercilessly slain.
Views of some Shia scholars who corroborate the above facts are presented here. Shabir Hussain lmrohi a compiler of the present day, writes in his “Mujahid-i-Azam”: “Hundreds of tales were fabricated.
The point to note here is how the caravan bound for Kufa from Makkah reached Karbala, about thirty miles from Kufa on route to Damascus. In fact, when this Kufa-bound caravan reached Alqura, it was stopped by and armed contingent of the Kufis. In the dialogue that ensued, the Kufis insisted that he should pledge loyalty to Yazid, to which he replied: “I have undertaken this journey on your specific request. I have no personal grudge against Yazid. If you are happy with the Government, the issue is resolved. Let me proceed on my way. The Kufis however, remained adamant on their demand. It is also reported that they out rightly denied sending any letter to him. At this, he called out each one by name and asked individually about those letters and messages. After a lot of discussion, it was agreed that all should proceed to Damascus and place the issue before Yazid. Therefore, the caravan and the armed escort set out for Damascus from Alqura, leaving Kufa on one side.
Karbala is the third way station from Alqura, located at the junction of Qura-Damascus and the Makkah-Medina routes. All these places and caravan routes (now metalled roads) still exist, probably with different names. The contention that it was a war between Islam and Kufr is ill-founded. If it were so, Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) would never agree to meet Yazid. He put forward three proposals: (1) To return, (2) To meet Yazid and (3) To migrate to some other country. Had he considered his journey as a march against Kufr he won’t have presented any of these proposals. According to M.A.Shariati (a Shia scholar):-
“Imam Hussain offered to return or go to border and cross over into a non-Muslim country rather than acknowledge the caliphate of Yazid”. (M.A.Shariati – p 29).
This is also a fact of history, acknowledged by both the Shias and the Sunnis that Hadhrat Hussain ((RAU) told the Kufi contingent:-
(1) “I cannot pledge loyalty to Yazid at your hands. Take me to him and I will do it there: (AI-Badaya-Wan-Nihaya – vol: 8 – p:170).
(2) “Let me go to Yazid, I will present myself to him then let him decide for me whatever he likes”. (AI-Amamat wa AI- Siasat – vol: 3 – p:7).
(3) 1 will place my hand in the hands of Yazid and see what he decides for me”. (Tarikh-ul-Umam – vol: 6 -p:235).
It was around 6th of Muharram that Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) left Alqura for Damascus alongwith the armed contingent. He hit Al-Azib on 7th, Qasr-e-Maktal on 8th and finally arrived at Karbala on the 9th of Muharram. This is a historical fact.
Compilation of the incident was done after a very long period. With the passage of time, facts got mingled with fiction and it became impossible to sift the truth from falsehood. Abu Makhanaf Loot-bin-Yahya Azdi was not present himself in Karbala, all his reports are based on hearsay which cannot be trusted. It is strange that several versions of his book Maqtal Abu Makhnaf are available and all of them are totally different from each other. He asserts that he himself is not the composer of these script but trusted some-one else who has compiled these telltale stories”.
“Briefly, all versions of this incident, from beginning to the end, are so contradictory that it would require many volumes to narrate them separately. Many stories like denial of water for three days to Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) and his family, the size of opposite army in hundreds of thousands, Shimar sitting on Hadhrat Hussain’s chest, beheading him, denuding his dead body, trampling it under the horses, outrage of family honour in public, removal of the cloaks of the grand daughters of Holy Prophet (SAW) etc. etc. are very famous and believed by every body although many of them are out rightly false, many are doubtful, many are ambiguous, many are exaggerated and concocted”. (Mujahid-i¬Azam – p: 1 87).
In fact the Kufis killed many birds with one stone; Shimar who reportedly beheaded Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) was the brother-i- law of Hadhrat Ali and real uncle of Jaffar, Abbaas and Usman (RAU) who were brothers of Hadhrat Hussain (RAU). He fought with outstanding bravery on Hadhrat Ali’s (RAU) side in the battle of Saffeen. Ibn-e-Saad was a cousin of the Holy Prophet (SAW) and in a way, grand-father of Hadhrat Hussain (RAU). According to ‘Jila- ul-Uyyun’ he used to sit for long hours with Hadhrat Hussain (RAU). Even the wife of Yazid was the daughter of Jaffar Tayyar, step-daughter of Hadhrat Zainab and niece of Hadhrat Hussain (RAU).
Besides these historical facts, I invite those who also require perceptive evidence besides the historical, to join us, acquire inner illumination through Allah’s zikr and Allah willing, they will themselves spiritually perceive all events. By the grace of Almighty Allah, even today I see those plains and small hillocks, I can witness heads being served off and bodies weltering in blood. The cloud of rising dust signals the catastrophe which has befallen Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) and his family. It is also incorrect that the two groups were on different sides of the river. I can see both on the same side. + + The setting sun is a witness to the calamity afflicting a pious Companion and a descendent of the Holy Prophet (SAW). If you have the capacity and determination then with Allah’s blessings, you can see for yourself the whole incident in its true perspective.
After the tragic incident the plundered caravan reached Damascus alongwith the Kufi troops. It is reported by lbne Jarir in `Kawar and `Tarikh-e-Kabir Zahbi’ that when Yazid learnt about the tragedy, his eyes welled up with tears and he exclaimed “You could have shown your loyalty even without killing Hadhrat Hussain (RAU). Curse be upon Ibne Semiya,by Allah, if I had been there, I would have absolved Hadhrat Hussain (RAU). May Allah bless him!” He did not reward the messenger who had brought this news. It would not be out of place here to quote from some of the Shia books on Yazid’s reactions:
(1) Wahj-ul-Ahzaan’ (published in Iran,p:321): Someone came and
told Yazid, “May your eyes cool, head of Hussain has arrived”.
Yazid looked at him furiously and retorted: “May your eyes never
Cool”.
(2) Whulasa-tul-Masaib’ p.293: “When the ill-fated caravan reached Damascus, Yazid could not control himself and kept wiping his tears with his handkerchief. He sent the entire family of Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) to the palace of his wife Hind-bint Amer. When they reached the palace, the out cries of wailing and lamentation could be heard outside”.
(3) Vila-ul-Uyyuni and ‘Traz-ul-Mazaffari’ p.468: “Yazid greatly honoured Hadhrat Ali bin Hussain (Zainul Abidin) and regularly dined with him. In case of his absence, Yazid neither ate nor rested”.
What happened later is also preserved in history. Yazid honoured the family a great deal, presented them gifts and wealth and according to the desire of Hadhrat Ali bin Hussain (Zainul Abidin) dispatched them to Medina under armed escort. He always upheld their honour to the extent that during the incident of Hurra when Medina was attacked by Yazid’s army, they did not bother Hadhrat Ali bin Hussain (Zainul Abidin) at all.
Only Hadhrat Zainab (RAU) stayed behind with her step daughter, the’ wife of Yazid. She died there and was laid to rest in that city. This voluntary stay is mischievously termed by the Shi’tes as 14 years of imprisonment. Yazid died much earlier in 64 AH and Marwan bin Alhakam had already succeeded Muawiyah bin Yazid at the time of her death. Now a word about the Kufis and their real designs.
Kufa came up as a military cantonment in 15 AH during the time of Hadhrat Umar (RAU). People kept settling in it from different places and it swelled into a city. It was also the centre of Jewish underground anti Islam movement which was responsible for the murder of Hadhrat Umar, Hadhrat Usman and Hadhrat Ali (RAU). Majority of the trusted lieutenants and disciples of its founder Abdullah Bin Saba were also to be found here. They called themselves Shi’an-e-Ali. It was only a political cover, denoting their political support for Hadhrat Ali (RAU), but actually they were ardent enemies of Islam. They were never loyal even to Hadhrat Ali (RAU), whose opinion has been quoted in Shia books, in these words:
“O the eunuchs who resemble men! The possessors of girlish mind and feminine intellect. Alas, I had never seen or known you. By Allah, this acquaintance has brought repentance and grief. May Allah extirpate you; you have filled my heart with sorrow and my bosom with rage. You made me swallow grief in measures. Through disobedience and lack of support you have marred my reputation to an extent where men of Qureysh proclaim that though Ibn Abi Talib is brave but does not know the art of warfare”.
When Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) came to know about the murder of Hadhrat Muslim (RAU) at Zubala, (on Kufa route), he exclaimed: ‘Our supporters have disgraced us”. (Khulasa-tul-Masaib p:49). This is also reported at page 201 of the same book that there was nobody else in Kufa at that time other than the Kufis. Quote: “There were no Syrians or Saudis (main land Arabs) amongst them, all were Kufis”. A great Shia scholar Qazi Noorullah Shoostri writes in his `Majalis-ul-Momineen’(page 25): “The fact that all Kufis were shias calls for no proof and that they could be Sunnis is against facts, although Abu Hanifa was from Kufa’.
In brief, this Shi’ite group was responsible for the planning and execution of the great disaster. Hundred and fifty years later, one of their descendents Lut-Bin-Yayha (died 195 AH), surname Abi Mikhnaf, compiled all the true and false into a book titled “Maqtal Hussain’ which has been treated as the basic reference by the later historians. After three hundred and fifty years Ma’az-ud-Daula formally founded a separate Shiite religion on the basis of Abu Jafar Kulaini’s book ‘Alkafi’. Kulaini died in 280 AH but he attributed all his religious reports to Hadhrat Jafar (RAU) who had passed away about two centuries before him. This is the first and the earliest basic book of their so called religion, other followed much later. “Man la Yahzrat ul Faqih was written by Muhammad bin-Ali ¬bin-Babooya Qummi in 381 AH and “Tahzibul Ahkam” and “Istibsar’ were compiled by Muhammad bin Hassan Toosi in 465 AH.
The plight of this sect before these books is mentioned in ‘Al-Kafi’ in following words: “Before Imam Baqar, Shias were ignorant about the rituals of Hajj and did not even know the commands about the permitted and the prohibited”.
This means that the Shias were not enlightened by the Dawn of Islam and its earliest illustrious history. They partook nothing from the Holy Prophet (SAW) nor accepted his teachings to be Islam. They rather based their religion on the falsehood and nonsense collected centuries later by people like Zararah and Abu Baseer, thus described in the Shia books: “This order pertains to a group of people like Zararah and Abu Baseer about whose delusion all the companions are unanimous”. (Haqal-Yageen (Urdu) p:724).
Such were the people on whose reports the Shia movement has been founded. May Allah never grant them salvation. These miscreants have introduced a parallel Islam. They concocted and substituted different methods of worship against the Islamic norms and teachings. They have reversed the Islamic code of vice and virtue. They refuted the Book of Allah and interpolated the Islamic beliefs about Divine Unity and Prophet Hood. They reviled against the Holy Prophet (SAW), his wives, daughters, companions and treacherously slew the members of his family. Even now, they are resolved to diffuse the truth of Islam and make it a collection of fairy tales by inserting their concocted drama about the Karbala incident, into it. Even after slaying Hadhrat Hussain (RAU) in cold blood fourteen centuries ago, these evil livers do not still spare him. They continue to invent fresh lies and ascribe these to him. That is an ever recurrent and a greater tradgedy. May Allah Almighty protect all Muslims in particular and all nations of the world in general from their guile. Ameen.
Related posts:
- Status of a Shia Imam
- Saudis arrest 5 Shias for celebrating Imam birthday
- In Pictures: Children Of Palestine Wants To Tell A Story To The World
You can discuss about reality and facts as you seem fit. Allah is withness to history.
Please appreciate that Hazrat Hussain and his brothers and nephews, the grand-children were martyed and the women folk of the prophet’s family were mis-treated. Please dig deeper and research rather than spreading in appropriate and fabricated information about parallel religion etc.
Think about it this way, Yezid grand-son Abu Sufiyan (the sworn enemy of the prophet) and Hazrat Hussain the grand-son of the prophet (who on numerous occasions demontsrated his love, affection and confirmation of Hussains presence in jannat). Now pick the side!
It is highly unfortunate that you have used your website to promote such fabricated stories. Religion has always remained personal but by directly mocking and attacking the Shia ideology of Islam you have marginalized yourselves. Irrespective of what you believe, and how you interpret Islam, you cannot deny that Hazrat Hussain (AS) was the grandson of our Prophet (SAW) and Hussain along with his family was martyred in Karabal. Have some shame and learn to respect people who differ from you, rather than mocking them and trying to spread articles that go against the belief of others. It is because of these very articles that have caused a rift amongst Muslims especially in Pakistan. By writing an article as you have above has not changed the perspective of either Shiites or even Sunnis for over 1400 years, why are you continuing mocking religion and beliefs when it won’t make a difference for the next 1400! Focus on the social issues in your community to bring about a change rather than trying to make others believe that Shiites have a flawed religion! By marginalizing Imam Hussain (AS) you are doing yourself a disservice for everyone. So please stop!
The writer has either done his best to inflame the anger and curses of those who hold our holy prophet PBUH and his family dear, or he has animosity toward the religion of Allah SWT, or he is a sadly ignorant.
Oh moulana muhammed akra, be mindful that youre writings show what is in your heart. You should keep your misguided theories to your self or be judged even more harshly. You will soon join the ranks of your beloved Muawiyah bin abu Sufyan, who spawned Yazid (L)
Assalam Alaikum,
Unfortunately I didn’t even finish reading a quarter of the article that I had to stop there and then because I cannot stand any of the lies in this completely misguided and retarded blog. What do we have to do prove to you that BOTH the Shias and Sunnis agree on the fact that the war of Karbala was one that was meant to save Islam and that Hussain (A.S.) made tremendous sacrifices so that Islam could be saved. They also agree on the matter of addressing Muawiya as a LANATI and not a sahaba of the Prophet (PBUH)
All I can say is shame on you. You succeeded in causing even more confusion and dissension among the Sunnis and Shias, who I think can get along very well without the likes of you poisoning our communities.
Please write LEGITIMATE articles. Once again SHAME ON YOU.
The events described by the writer are logical and proven through history. At no point has he ignored the respect and love for Hazrat Hussain(RAU), but mixing history with religion is a big mistake. The historic events that took place in Karbala were correctly mentioned as Hazarat Hussain(RAU) was a man of peace, and the KUFIs who have a long history of betraying, Hazrat Ali(RAU) then finally Hazrat Hussain(RAU), were the ones who are now portraying themselves as servants of Hussain(RAU). I would like to bring every one’s ttention to one point. That islam was complete at the time of prophet mohammad(PBUH) and who ever gives addition to the orginal version of islam, will be exited from islam. Therefore, my advice to all the muslims, please follow islam and not history and dont mix an historic event with islam as in islam there is no weaping on martyers as thery are alive. Furthermore, by creating a prallel islam, they should be fearful of Allah’s anger. History and religion are two different things and may even result in shirk
This is actually correct version of Karbala incident. The religion based on stories has nothing to do with islam sent by almighty Allah on Hazrat Muhammad SAW.
Please be careful while commenting on sahaba rasool which can destroy oyr eiman.
God help all to understand the true teaching of islam.
Hum Karachi mai, Ashora kay Jaloos par honay walay khud kash hamlay ki pur zoor muzamat kartay hain.
@AHR
U stated that this website is promoting febricated stories. You are quite right because this website published many febricated stories like;
Eid e Ghadeer: The confirmation of Islam by Jalal Meerza
13 Rajab Shaan Hazrat Ali (A.S) by Jalal Meerza
Ali Ibne Abi Talib’s Letter as Leader by Jalal Meerza
Status of Shia Imam By Jalal Meerza
The above-mentioned all stories are against the belief of 98% of Ummah, but I surprized nobody like you voiced against Jalal Meerza, even appreciated him for these fake and febricated tales.
The Author Inspired with a historian Mehmood Ahmad Abbasi, he discribed the event of Kabala very well. After reading this article the one who has small knowledge on the subject can easily understand the reality of Karbala.
Well I am not a authority on Islam, but alhamdullah I am a muslim , and how much I know Islamic Histry , I can under stand ” WHY THIS STORY IS A PAID DOCUMENT” . YOU FOLLOW YOUR FAKE STORIES , BUT DONT DITRACE THE ISLAMIC HISTRY. THANK YOU
salam every one
I surprised that in our country some people are on grate cause like this person who has published this true history of karbala and trying to tell us truth i knw very much history of islam. this is true story of karbala but sadly i wana say that in our religion in pakistan 2 % people misguide to all muslim and show behave danger like 28-12-2009 10 moharam after sucide attack they burnt pakistan bigest markets in karachi. pakistan is under attack of terrorist, in peshawar every day sucide attack was Attempted but no one shoe danger behave like this everybody knows what they wants in pakistan (they wants pakistan become a shia state) i like to mention here few year ago they burnt 4 person in kfc restaurant, who is Actual Terrorist ? think about and Read THE HOLLY QURAN without mixing any history Literature and read with neutral way
i assure you that you can understand who is actual terrorist ?
Finally a version of the kerbala with facts unlike the Shitte version where they thrust their fabricated epic emotionally down one’s throat
hum 10 mohrum ka waqya pa bhut ufsurda ha or is ke sub sa buri waja ya ha k humaray suuni bhai zyda shaeed hoa ya un ke kumilmi ha ka wo us juloos ma shareek hotay ha or kafaro ka sath mil ka un ka gum jo durhuqeet un he napana ap ki dya ha or us pa rotya ha shamil hotay ha . meri dua ha Allha pak hum sub ko sucha muslaman bunay or in nam nehad so called muslims sa hum ko mahfooz rukhya (Ameen)
Its an unfortunate part that we enjoy living in myths and legends. So little of us even read history written by unbiased historians. The author may have swayed on ocassions due to his beliefs and background but as a matter fo fact most of what he has written is very near to truth and based on true research work.
Its an irony that no one can prove what actually happened as no one was present there, however its noteworthy that had these stories been not narated the way our brothern Shias narrate it, their number would dwindle. Their narration of Karbala in the manner they do is basically an important milestone in the transition of a political group named Shiane ali to shia sect.
Despite what ever differences we have we should not forget that we all are muslims whether shia or sunni and we may also have differences but we should strive for what has been demanded from us in the book of Allah.
@swordman
It is really unfortunate that a group of killers of Hadrat Hussain themself started Matam of Hussain to divert attention towards wrong side and toward their rivals Banu Umayadh, Even today they are engage in the killing of thousand of Muslim, the incident of Karachi is the evident of it, they killed number of people and started looting the wealth of the sunnies finaly set fire of the markets and properties. and do not allowed to the fire fighters to do their job and they open fire on fire fighters.
These are the generation of Abdullah Bin Sabbah (basically who was a Jew) the master mind of murder of Hadrat Uthman R.A, Anarchy is the agenda of this groupe.
It is shias history who always killed innocent sunni, like Hadrat Ali r.a, Hadrat Usman r.a, Hadrat Hussain r.a. and in pakistan they once again killed plenty of innocent sunnies in Karachi on 10th Mouharam.
The multi millioners and even billionor’s business distoroyed, their show rooms , shoups and properties fired for nothing of their any fault. but it was the hate of these enemies of islam and muslims whose aim to de-stablize muslims / sunnies.
Ali zindabad, Umer zindabad, Usman zindabad, Hussain Zindabad, Mavia Zindabad,
Khomaini Murdabad, Iran Murdabad.
simple math: 3 mph X 12 hours travel per day X 2As distance between Makkah and Karbala is Atleast 800 miles (according to neutral sites, not sunni or Shia)
So keeping the camels ‘average speed which is 30 to 36 miles /day.(this is also taken from neutral site),its possible .23 or 22 days = 792 miles, so it is possible. info got from a site about camels
“Speed: Walking speed is 3 miles per hour (m.p.h.). A camel caravan would normally travel 36miles a day. A racing camel can reach 12 m.p.h. at a gallop for short distances. This speed was used by Arab warriors in attacking an enemy.”
sible.
So your site shows your mind which is based on wrong history of islam
The multi millioners and even billionor’s business distoroyed, their show rooms , shoups and properties fired for nothing of their any fault. but it was the hate of these enemies of islam and muslims whose aim to de-stablize muslims / sunnies.
Ali zindabad, Umer zindabad, Usman zindabad, Hussain Zindabad, Mavia Zindabad,
Khomaini Murdabad, Iran Murdabad.
Firdous awan sahib kia aap ko allah eyes and ears nhi dia ye enemies koi shia nhi hai bulkay ye tamam pakistan ka enemy hain shias na to apni relatives ki lashain bhi nhi udhain thi jub aag lagyi the
aap mujh ko batain ka Khomaini ka alawa koi murda momen pada nhi hua jis na america ko Murdabad kha hai
you are abig stupid
What was the purpose of this shameful and decietful concoction and re-writing of history? There isnt any “reality” in your shameless concoction of lies.
May allah swt give you some iman so you realise your great sin in writing this poison. Your “story” doesnt read very well and does not have any kind of logic to it. It seems almost half hearted in its argument. I wonder what your purpose was in writing this. Are you muslim?
Yaazid was by all accounts even that of his accursed hencman Ibn Zayed a “fornicator, with a hard tongue, and savage disposition, who consorted with unbearded boys (homosexuals) , was in a drunken state during the day, and instead of praying went hunting”
Yes the people of Kufa shamefully abandoned the noble grandson of the prophet muhammed (peace be upon them all) but it was Yaazid and his henchmen Diljawshan, Umar ibn Sa’ad , Ibn Ziyad and the others of their ilk who murdered and desecrated the household of the prophet mohammed pbuh and his companions, and these men have been accursed and punished in they’re graves ever since.
laanat on the shamefaced liar who printed this “reality” behind karbala story.
Yes i am a sunni muslim. But I am clear Yazid and his henchmen killed The beloved grandson of the prophet pbuh and it was the shiahs of kufa who betrayed the imam Ali and bought this disaster through their action and non action and treachoury
That said many of them didnt do it willingly they were bullied into inaction by Yazid, and many of them regretted it later and tried to kill Ibn Ziyad and were martyred afterwards. Another shiah Al Mukhtar succeeded in beheading and burning the kuffar bodies of Diljawshan, Umar ibn Sa’ad , Ibn Ziyad to get revenge for the honor of the house of the prophet muhammed pbuh.
Sunnis and shiahs are united in theyre love for the house of the prophet muhammed pbuh so please do not spread stories to ferment hatred of muslims. Both sunnis and shiahs are muslims alike and one day we will unite so that scum like your beloved Muawiyahbin sufyan will not be able to spawn other yazids of this world.
The problem is now a days INDIA
india is the most RACIST and TERRORIST country in the world
indian RAW involved in suicide bombing in pakistan…RAW involved in balochistan
and sindh and NWFP.
hello mr. swar, who the r u to comment on only muslim nuclear state. hv u gone through ur history what hav u been doing? since the inception of muslims in sub continent, u bloody hindus hav been more jeolous of us. u shud know ur own reality. we know what v r. u r the main xploiters and hav illegally occupied kashmir and doing terrorism in balochistan. we will inshaallah recover from that bad patch and ur criminal thinking can not affect us.
pakistan zindabad
a patriot pakistani
fuuuck offfffffff india
@ umar
For your kind information, the actual distance is about 1000 Miles, and remember, carvan was comprises with women, children and senior age members, it was impossible to run as fast as you mentioned, you may also recall the wrost condition of the way from Makkah to Karbala at 1500 years back, I have gone through myself half of the way, I know it was impossible 1500 years back even, it is impossible today where ways are extreemly good, nobody can reach Karbala if started his journey after performance of hajj on 1st week of Moharam,
I observed that there are some important maps and text so
It is a great article, i have read the book of Moulana Akram Awan on Karbala, he given a map of the all Manazil the way Karavane Hussain adopted that are about 22 from Mecca to Karbala. If the said map and complete details of 22 Manazil be given, then the article will be more understandable.
Is there any comparison between Yazid and my Imam, is there any one better Muslim than Imam Hussain at that time? Does it matters if he performed Hajj or not?? I am feeling so ashamed to be a part of this sleeping society, who dont even know the histories and sacrifices of their ancestors.
Listen ‘It was the time to prevent and save HAJJ from yazid (lanati) it was a time to take an action for the Muslim society, my Imam gave sacrifices only for the Islaah of muslims. It was not the war of power but the war of truth. If anyone wants to take off the respect of your family what you would do? I am sure you people were only give comment and leave your fmily member in that pain, but Imam took an action when Islam needed him. Yazid was making amendments in islamic rules, my Imam not only saved Islam but showed up the love he had for GOD by sacrifices his loved noes, Islam was his love, his food, his life , Imam cannot see that faided, thats why he took up an action and moved to give the BAQA to Islam.
After reading above muslims comment, i must say, YAZID is all here in your hearts who cant see the truth, yazid is in your minds, who cant think and jugde the right and worng, yazid is in your tongue, who can only speak hatred words, yazid is in your soul, who never allow you to elaborate the KARBALA in right vision. Yazid is in your ears, who appreciate the hatred words spoke by any person goes to his favour, YAZID is in your souls who cant realize the truth and Fake. However, for all your comments about shiaat, i must smile on it, WE DONT CARE OF YOUR PERCEPTIONS ABOUT OUR RELIGION, ITS OUR HONOUR AND WE THANKED GOD TO PUT OURSELVES IN THIS PRECIOUS FIRQAH IN ISLAM WHICH IS FILLED OF KNOWLEDGE, VISION, TRUTH.
May GOD grant you guys vision , gave capibility to struggle for knowing the truth, may GOD prevent you by accepting all misleads. And what about author I must say ” YAZID IS ALIVE”. And its my responsibilty to perform the sunnat of my Prophet P.B.U.H thats is “AMER BIL MARUF and NAHI ANIL MUNKIR’ means ‘ SACH BAAT KEHNA OR GHALAT BAAT SAY ROOKNA’. Never accept anyone’s theory with out investigation its our responsibility to take care of our people from such kind of misleaders(author) of the article. May GOD give you the eyes of TRUTH.
HAR DUROOD OR HAR SALAM, MAADAR -E- HUSSAIN TERAY NAAM (Allah humma sallay alla Muhammad S.A. wa AALAY Muhammad S.A).
Regards,
Shia
Till today you never follows Rasool S.A.W. instuctions Like Mankunto Maula Ho Fahaza Ali Un Maula (See in all History books about Ghadeer).In Islam who has given u rights to elect any khalipha can u elect any other book in place of Quran,in same way u can elect any one in place of Hazrat Ali a.s.Islam has no rights for election it is only selection of God.
Which elected Khalipha/Sahaba was present along with Rasool S.A.W. in Jung-E-Ohad (all run away by leaving Rasool S.A.W. except Hazrat Ali a.s.) .
Which elected Khalipha was present in JANAZA-E-Rasool S.A.W. when he gone from this world.
In Khaiber when all elected Khaliphas and Sahaba lost 29 days then Rasool S.A.W. told Kal Mai Usko Alam Dunga Jo Mard Hai, Karrar Hai aur Gair-E-farrar hai .This statement clearly indicates what was others who fought last 29 days in Khaiber.
Where is UMMUL MOMINEEN Bibi Ayesha’s Roaza (Kabr) and how she died plz check in ur history if u don’t get ask ur this moula who has written this article and shown his Nutfa……. Alla Humma Laan Katalatal Hussain Wa As-haabil Hussain
I really appreciate the way the author has unravelled the true facts of what happened at Karbala. it is now left to those who are searching for the truth to make judgement for themselves using the shiites references cited by the author. it is not an issue of abusing one another it is an issue of ‘HATU BURHANAKUM IN KUNTUM SAADIKIN.’ As the saying goes in my language
“MAI ABUN FADA BAYA FADA” Meaning: He who has proof does not fight.
Wassalamu ala man tabial huda.
Astaghfirullah this is nothing but bundles of lies,i never heard the names of the books the author has mentioned.i don’t beleive a person can go to such an extent in defending Yazeed Laeen.These are all fabrications and lies.One question to the author why he didn’t punished the killers of Imam hussain a.s.While giving your version of tragedy of Karbala you forgot to mention that the next year of his Khilafa he attacked Madina Munawarra and after that he attacked Makkah Mukarama go google this and you will find it,May Allah curse his soul and he remain in Hell forever with his supporters.
More research required on this topic to bring real history to common muslim
may Allah pak give us “Hidait”
Ameen
Dear Maulana Akram can I have your email ID
Maulvi Akram Sahib, you are a Fitna. May All save us from the evils of every Satan accursed.
Ye aik Musalama Haqiqat hai kay, Karbala ki Kahani Hazrat Hussain R.A ki shahadat kay 100 sal bad Abu Mukhanaf nai likhi, Karbala kay sanehay mai sir Hazrat Ali Bin Hussain (Zain ul Abideen Alehe Rehma) zinda bachay thai, Hazrat hi uss waqai kay Eye Witness thai, surprizingly unhoon nai kisi ko aisi kahani nahi sunai jo ye munafiq aur qatilan e Hussain R.A sunatay hain,
Koi aik Ravi aisa nahi hai jis nai Hazrat Zain ul Abideen say riwayat ki ho, Jahan tak Abu Mukhanaf Kazib ka Talouq hai, us ki tou Hazrat Zain ul Abideen say Mulaqat hi sabit hoti hai, tou wo kis tarah un kay rafrence sai riwayat kar sakta hai,
Abu Mukhanuf Kazib ki tou birth hi Hazrat Zain ul Abideen ki wafat kay bad hoi, agar chand chouti riwayat ko accept bhi kar liya jaye tou be Abu Mukhanaf Kazib Hazrat Zain ul Abideen ki wafat kay waqat chand sal ka tha.
Khoud bay shumar Shia writers iss bat ko tasleem kartay hain kay Karbala ki Kahani mai bouhat exegeration ki gai hai, aur haqiqat kay khilaf bayan kiya gaya hai.
Moulana did well, May Allah give him health and long life to unearth such type of Munafiq and Islam Dushman.
Lanat in those that speak against Haqq.
Ma Smajhta hoon K hamain Guzra howay tamam waqaiat per Bahas k bajae Khamoshi Ikhtiar kerne chaheya Q K abb un Waqaiat k baray me koi bhi haqiqat bayan nahi ker sakta. Bal k sub apnee soch k hisab sa bahas kerta hain jis kee waja sa Ajj Sahaba-e-karaam or Ahle- Bait (Rizwan Allah Ta-ala- Ajameen) mozooa-e-Bahas benta ha aur baz daffa un Hazraat ke shaan ma gustakhi bhi hote ha, Lihaza Apna Aqeeda to Islam pehlana k Lea istamal kerain na k Apna Aqeeda Musallat kerain.
Farman-e -Rasool (sal-Allah-o-Aliahi-Wasalm)” Maray Sahaba Shamma Ke manand hain tum jis ke bhe pervi kero gay, Falah pao ga.”
@ saqib
You quoted hadith regarding companion of Prophet SAL is an ideal example, if these munafiq shias do not accept this hadith then, they can consult with Quran wherein, Allah himself told that “Razi Allaho Unho wa Razo Anh” Means Allah Sahaba sai razi hai aur sahaba Allah sai razi hain
And plenty of places in quran companions of Prophet SAL idealized by Allah
But these enemies of companions of Prophet SAL and enemies of Islam are abuzing against companions of Prophet SAL, this is the belief of these shia to abuse against Sahaba.
We Sunnies never say any thing aginst ALI, Hussain, Hassan, being Sahaba, but why these AQAL KAY ANDHAY , Quran K Munkir, Sahaba Ki Shan mai Gustakhi kartay hain.
ACCORDING TO SHIA RELIGION THERE ARE FIVE PRINCIPLES
OF DEAN AS STATED IN THEIR FAMOUS BOOK (TOHFATUL
AWWAM) . THESE ARE “TAWHEED AD’L (JUSTICE), NUBUWAAH
(PROPHETHOOD) IMAMATE AND QIYAMAH (DOOMSDAY).
1. TAWHEED STANDS FOR THE UNITY OF GOD (ALLAH).
(HOWEVER, SHIA DOCTRINES LIKE BADA AND IMAMATE NEGATA
TAWHAAD).
2. AD’L i.e. ALLAH IS JUST (ADIL). IT WOULD HAVE BEEN
AGAINST THE JUSTICE OF GOD IF AFTER THE CESSATION OF
PROPHETHOOD BY MUHAMMAD , THE IMAMS WERE NOT APPOINTED
BY ALLAH ONE AFTER THE OTHER IN SUCH A WAY AS PREVIOUS
PROPHETS WERE GIVEN THEIR DEPUTIES.
3. NUBUWWAH i.e. MUHAMMAD , IS THE NABI (PROPHET)OF
ALLAH.
ALTHOUGH SHIAS ACKNOWLEDGE PROPHET MUHAMMAD AS THE
LAST OF PROPHETS BUT BECAUSE OF THEIR BELIEF IN
IMAMATE WHICH IS CONSIDERED HIGHER THAN PROHETHOOD AND
THAT THE IMAMS CAN ALTER THE SHARI’AH, THE CONCEPT OF
NUBUWWAH BECOMES MEANINGLESS . AS THE ISSUE OF
FINALITY OF THE PROPHETHOOD IS THE CENTERAL CORE OF
ISLAM TO WHICH SHIAS ALSO SUBSCRIBE OUTWARDLY, ANYONE
WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE IN IT OR UNDERMINES ITS
IMPORTANCE BY VARIUOS INTERPRETATION IS THROWN OUTSIDE
THE PALE OF ISLAM. THE DIVINE INSTITUTION OF NUBUWWAH
AND IMAMATE OF THE SHIAS ARE OPPOSITE ENTITIES WHICH
CANNOT BE RECONCILED.
4. IMAMATE: THERE ARE TWELVE IMAMS IN SHIA RELIGION
FROM HADHRAT ALI TO IMAM MAHDI WHO LIKE THE PROPHETS
ARE NOT ONLY MASOOM (SINLESS AND INFALLIBLE) AND
HAVING BEEN COMISSIONED BY ALLAH BUT THEY ARE EVEN
SUPERIOR TO HADHRAT IBRAHIM KHALILULLAH, HADHRAT MUSA
ROOHULLAH, HADHRAT ISSA KALIMULLAH AND REST OF ALL
OTHER PROPHETS.
THIS IS THE STATEMENT OF THE SHIITTE BUT ACCORDING TO
RESEARCH AND HISTORICAL EVIDENCE THE SO-CALLED 12
IMAMS OF THE SHIA NEVER IN THEIR LIVES CLAIMED THAT
ARE DIVINELY APPOINTED IMAMS OR LEADERS OF THE MUSLIM
COMMUNITY. THEY LIVED LIKE ORDINARY CITIZENS AND
OFFERED CONGREGATIONAL PRAYERS ALONG WITH OTHER
MUSLIMS IN THE MASJID BEHIND THE IMAM OF THE
AREA/LOCALITY. IN FACT SHIA AS A SEPERATE ORGANISED
RELIGION DID NOT EXIST FOR SOME 200 YEARS OF ISLAM.
FURTHER DETALIS ARE DISCUSSED IN CHAPTER 17 “THE BASIS
OF FIQH JAFARI’AH.”
5. QIYAMAH: THE SHIAS BELIEVE IN THE LAST DAY
(QIYAMAH) BUT WITH SOME DIFFERENCE FROM WHAT HAS BEEN
STATED IN THE QUR’AN AND HADITH.
ACCORDING TO BELIEF OF AHLE-SUNNAH AS TAUGHT BY THE
HOLY QUR’AN AND RASUL-ALLAH (SAW), ALL THE HUMAN
BEINGS WHETHER MUSLIMS OR KAFIRS WILL BE BROUGHT TO
LIFE AGAIN ON THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT (QIYAMAH) AND WILL
BE PUNISHED OR REWARDED ACCORDINGLY BY ALMIGHTY ALLAH.
HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO SHIAS, THERE WILL BE A SMALLER
QIYAMAH WITH THE ADVENT OF IMAM MAHDI BEFORE THE
GREATER QIYAMAH. IN THIS SMALLER QIYAMAH,THE AUTHORITY
FOR GIVING PUNISHMENT OR REWARD WILL BE IMAM MAHDI
HIMSELF. IN THIS WAY HE WILL BE THE POSSESSER OF
DIVINE ATTRIBUTE (MIGHTY,ABLE TO REQUITE THE WRONG)
IT MAY BE NOTED HERE THAT ACCORDING TO SHIA RELIGION,
BELIEF IN IMAMATE IS A FUNDAMENTAL IN ISLAM LIKE
TAWHEED, RISALAT AND QIYAMAH (DOOMSDAY). ANYONE WHO
DOES NOT HAVE FAITH IN IT IS A KAFIR (INFIDEL) AND
DESTINED TO HELL.*
ACCORDING TO SHIA BELIEF THE NAME OF THEIR 12 IMAMS
ARE INSCRIBED ON THE THRONE . ALMIGHTY ALLAH HAS
DECLARED ABOUT THEIR LEADESHIP IN THE QUR’AN . KHOMENI
IN EXPOSITION OF VERSE 67 OF SURAH AL-MAIDAH* WRITES
THAT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD WASAFRAID * TO DECLARE THE
IMAMATE OF ALI AS HE SENSED SERIOUS OPPOSITION FROM
HIS PEOPLE WHO WERE NOT FAVOURABLY DISPOSED TOWARDS
ALI (R.Z). IN THE LONG RUN ACCORDING TO KHOMENI THE
PROPHET DID MAKE THE ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT ALI’S (R.Z)
SUCCESSION ON RECEIVING DIVINE PROMISE OF PROTECTION
BUT THE MAJORITY OF SAHABAH (BELONGING TO THE
OPPOSITION PARTY* OF HADHRAT ABU BAKR (R.Z) AND
HADHRAT UMAR (R.Z) WHO WERE AGAINST ALI (R.Z) DEFIED
THIS PROCLAIMATION AND INSTEAD OF ALI (R.Z) BECAME
THEMSELVES THE CALIPHS BY COERCION.
THIS IS A GREAT TRAVESTY OF TRUTH HADHRAT ALI HAD THE
UTMOST LOVE AND REGARD FOR HADHRAT ABU BAKR (R.Z)
HADHRAT UMAR (R.Z) AND OTHER SAHABAH OF RASUL-ALLAH .
HE CONSIDERED HADHRAT ABU BAKR (R.Z) MOST SUITED AND
DESERVING FOR THE OFFICE OF CALIPHATE AFTER THE DEMISE
OF RASUL-ALLAH .* IF HOWEVER , FOR A MOMENT FOR THE
SAKE OF ARGUMENT WE ADMIT THAT KHOMENI IS CORRECT IN
WHAT HE HAS SAID ABOVE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF SHIA
RELIGION THAT RASUL-ALLAH . NOMINATED HADHRAT ALI
(R.Z) FOR THE OFFICE OF CALIPHATE AND IMAMATE AND MADE
A DECLARATION TO THIS EFFECT AT GHADIR-KHUM, THEN IT
WILL HAVE TO BE ADMITTED AS ITS LOGICAL OUT COME THAT
RASUL-ALLAH MISERABLY FAILED IN THE TRAINING AND
CHARACTER BUILDING OF HIS UMMAH TO THE EXTENT THAT NO
PREVIOUS PROPHET OR REFORMER HAD FAILED SO CONSPIOUSLY
RASUL-ALLAH SINCE THE DAWN OF PROPHET HOOD UNTIL HIS
DEMISE REFORMED AND REFINED THOSE PEOPLE WITH HIS
TEACHINGS, PREACHINGS AND EXAMPLE WITH WHOM HE LIVED,
TRAVELLED AND WHO WERE TAUGHT IN HIS COMPANY BUT THOSE
VERY PEOPLE AS SOON AS HE DIED COMMITTED SUCH A
TREACHERY THAT IN PURSUIT OF WORLDLY GAIN AND POWER,
THEY OVER TURNED THAT VERY DIVINE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED
BY RASUL-ALLAH DESTINED TILL QAIYMAH FOR THE WELFARE
OF UMMAH AND ABOUT WHICH ONLY A FEW DAYS BACK (BEFORE
THE DEMISE OF RASUL-ALLAH ) THEY HAD PLEDGED AND GIVEN
ALLEGIANCE CAN THERE BE ANY EXAMPLE OF SUCH GROSS
FAILURE OF A REFORMER ?
THE OTHER DANGEROUS CONSEQUENCE OF SUCH A BELIEF WOULD
BE THAT THE WHOLE DEEN WOULD BECOME UNRELIABLE BECAUSE
WE GOT THIS DEEN THROUGH THE AGENCY OF SAHABAH OF
RASUL-ALLAH . IF THESE PEOPLE ARE HELD UNFAITHFUL AND
FOLLOWERS OF THEIR OWN LUST AND PASSION, THEN
NATURALLY ONE CANNOT RELY ON THEIR DEEN & IMAN. THE
QUR’AN ESPECIALLY, CANNOT BE TAKEN AS GENUINE ONE
SINCE THE PRESENT QUR’AN WAS COMPILED AND PUBLISHED
DURING THE CALIPHATE OF HADHRAT’S ABU BAKR (R.Z) UMAR
(R.Z) AND USMAN (R.Z) WHOM THE SHIAS CONSIDER USUPERS
OF HADHRAT ALI (R.Z) CALIPHATE AND UNBELIEVERS AND
RENEGADES. IT IS BUT NATURAL THEN TO CONCEIVE THAT
SUCH PEOPLE WOULD HAVE DONE ALL SORTS OF ALTERATIONS
IN THE QUR;AN TO SUIT THEIR WORDLY PURPOSES AS IT IS
STATED IN THE VARIOUS SACRED BOOKS OF THE SHIAS.
ONE CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION BROUGHT
ABOUT BY KHOMENI WITHOUT COMPREHENDING THE CONCEPT OF
IMAMATE AND i.e. PERIOD WHEN THE LAST IMAM GHAIB
(HIDDEN) WILL COME OUT FROM HIS CAVE AND WILL BE
TEMPORAL AND SPIRITUAL RULER OF THE UMMAH. EVEN DURING
HIS ABSENCE HE CONTINUES TO BE IN THIS POSITION TILL
QIYAMAH. THAT IS WHY THE SHIA’S CONSIDER ALL THOSE WHO
WERE RULERS PRVIPUSLY (i.e. THE FIRST THREE CALIPHS)
OR THE PRESENT-DAY RULERS IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES AS
USURPERS, OPPRESSORS AND AGENTS OF EVIL FORCES
(TAGOOTH) ACCORDING TO THEIR BELIEF, ACCORDING TO THEM
RULERSHIP IS THE RIGHT OF THEIR MASOOM IMAMS WHO HAVE
BEEN COMMISSIONED BY ALLAH FOR THIS PURPOSE ; WHOSE
RANKS IS EQUIVALENT RASUL-ALLAH AND ARE SUPERIOR TO
OTHER PROPHETS. AS IT IS OBLIGATORY TO HAVE FAITH IN
THE PROPHET AND TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND OBEY HIM IS A
QUARANTEE FOR SALVATION SIMILARY IT IS BINDING TO
ACKNOWLEDGE THE IMAMATE OF 12 IMAMS AND HAVE FAITH IN
THEM AS ORDAINED RULERS AND NASOOM (SINLESS AND
INFALLIBLE) WHICH IS A CONDITION FOR SALVATION.
KHOMENI IS NOT ONLY A SHIA BUT IS AMONG THE TOP-NOTCH
OF SHIA PRIESTS WHO ARE CALLED (AYAT -ALLUAH). HIS
BOOK (AL-HAKOMAT-AL-ISLAMIA) PROVIDES THE RELIGIOUS
AND INTELLECTUAL BASIS OF THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION. IN
HTIS BOOK SPREAD OVER 150 PAGES IT HAS BEEN TRIED TO
PROVE THAT DURING THE AWAITING PERIOD (GHIBET-E-KUBRA)
OF THE LAST IMAM (i.e. IMAM MAHDI) WHICH HAD ALREADY
PASSED TO THE EXTENT OF 1000 YEAR AND WHICH MAY
STRETCH FUTHER TO THOUSAND YEARS (P.26), IT IS THE
DUTY OF FUQQAHA (i.e. SHIA MUJTAHIDDIN) THAT THEY
SHOULD TRY TO TAKE THE AFFAIRS OF THE GOVERNMENT IN
THEIR OWN HANDS AS DEPUTY AND ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE
HIDDEN IMAM, WHICH ANY SUCH MUJTAHID WHO IS CAPABLE OF
THIS TASK RISES FOR MAKING SUCH ENDEAVOURS, THEN HIS
OBEDIENCE IN MATTERS IN MATTERS OF SOCIETY AND
STATECRAFT WILL BE BINDING FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE SAME
WAY AS IT IS IN CASE OF AN IMAM AND EVEN A PROPHET AND
RASUL-ALLAH . IN THIS VERY BOOK UNDER THE
CAPTION———- HE WRITES: ” WHEN ANY FAQIH
(MUJTAHID) WHO IS WELL VERSED AND IS JUST RISERS TO
ORGANISE THE AFFAIRS OF THE STATE AND FORM A
GOVERNMENT , HE WILL ENJOY THOSE VERY POWERS WHICH ARE
EXERCISED BY A PROPHET AND IT WILL BE OBLIGATORY FOR
THE PEOPLE TO HEAR AND OBEY HIM. HE WILL BE THE
SUPREME COMMANDER, GUARDIAN AND CUSTODIAN OF ALL THE
AFFAIRS OF THE UMMAH IN THE SAME WAY AS RASUL-ALLAH
AND AMEE-UL-MOMINEEN ALI (R.Z) WERE (DURING THEIR
TIME.) “(P.49).
IN THE SAME BOOK KHOMENI WRITES ABOUT THEIR IMAMS
UNDER THE CAPTION :” IMAM ENJOYS SUCH AN EXALTED
STATUS AND KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPIRE THAT EVERY PARTICLE IN
THE UNIVERSE IS SUBJECT TO HIS COMMAND AND OBEDIENCE”
(P.52). IN ISLAM, SUCH A RANK AND STATS HAS NOT BEEN
CONFERRED EVEN ON RASUL–ALLAH AND IT HAS BEEN MADE
PLAIN IN THE QUR’AN AT SEVERAL PLACES THAT ONLY ALLAH
IS THE ABSOLUTE RULER OVER THE UNIVERSE.
AT ANOTHER PLACE IN THE SAME BOOK KHOMENI WRITES: “THE
TEACHINGS OF OUR IMAMS ARE LIKE THE TEACHINGS OF THE
QUR’AN. THESE ARE NOT CONFINED TO ANY SPECIAL GROUP OR
SPECIFIED PERIOD, RAHTER THESE ARE FOR ALL AGES AND
FOR ALL PEOPLES TILL DOOMSDAY. AS SUCH IT IS BINDING
TO ENFORCE AND COMPLY WITH THEM.” (P. 113).
THERE IS NO DENYING THE FACT THAT IMAMATE IS THE
ANTITHESIS OF KHALIFAT-RASHIDAH; RAHTER THE CONCEPT OF
FINALITY OF PROPHET-HOOD BECOMES MEANINGLESS IN THE
WAKE OF IMAMATE. BACAUSE OF IMAMTE, AHLE-SUNNAH HAVE
FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCES WITH THE SHIAS SINCE IN THE
SIGHT OF THE LATTER (SHIAS) IMAMATE IS SUPERIOR TO
NUBAWWAH. AS A DENIER OF TAWHEED IS A KAFIR SO IS THE
DENIER OF NUBAWWAH BUT BECAUSE SHIA ULAMA TAKE TAQIAH
AS THE BASIS OF THEIR RELIGION THEY HIDE WHAT IS THERE
IN THEIR HEARTS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE SET GOALS.
ACCORDING TO USUAL A-KAFI TAQIYAH IS 9/10 OF THE
RELIGION. YAQIYAH IS SUCH AN IMPORTANT ACT OF WORSHIP
THAT IN EARLIER PERIODS MANY SHIA ULAMA HAVE BEEN
WORKING UNDERGROUND IN THE GUISE OF SUNNI MUSLIM
ALIMS. A SHIA HIGH PRIEST OF PAKISTAN MUFTI JAFFAR
HUSSAIN MUJTAHID ONCE DECLARED; “THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN SHIA AND SUNNIS IS ONLY TO THE EXTENT OF
DIFFERENCE PREVAILING AMONG THE FOUR SCHOOLS OF
THOUGHT OF AHLESUNNAH I.E. HANAFI, SHAFI, MALIKI AND
HAMBALI. ALL THIS IS A TAQIYAH. SIMILARLY ANOTHER SHIA
MUJTAHID, ALLAMA RAZI DECLARED ON THE OCCASION OF
NAFIZ ISLAM CONFERENCE/ ULAMA CONVENTION IN ISLAMABAD
ON 31ST JANUARY 1985:” THOSE WHO REVILE THE SAHBAH AND
UMMHATUL MOMINEEN ARE NON-MUSLIMS.” BUT THE QUESTION
IS DO SHIAS CONSIDER HADHRAT ABU BAKR, UMAR AND USMAN
(R.A) MOMIN AND MUSLIM IN THE SAME WAY AS THEY
CONSIDER HADHRAT FATIMAH (R.A)? THE SHIAS TRY TO
DECEIVE AHLE SUNNAH BY UTTERING SUCH PHRASES WHICH ARE
INTENDED TO WIN OVER SUNNI MUSLIMS!
IN THE LIGHT OF ABOVE, THOSE PEOPLE WHO CALL THE
REVOLUTION IN IRAN AS “ISLAMIC REVOLUTION” AND RAISE
SUCH SLOGANS IN CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS AS (I.E.
ISLAMIC REVOLUTION IS NEITHER SHIA NOR SUNNI) ARE
UNAWARE OF THE BASIC RUDIMENTS OF THIS REVOLUTION.
TO HAVE AN OPINION ABOUT ANY MOVEMENT OR REVOLUTION,
IT IS ESSENTIAL TO KNOW THE IDEAS AND LEANINGS OF ITS
FOUNDER/LEADER. ANYONE WHO OVERLOOKS THIS
PRE-REQUISITE PURPOSELY OR DEEMS IT LAWFUL TO IGNORE
IT, IS BEREFT OF IMAN (FAITH) AND HIS SOLE PURPOSE AND
MOTIVE IS ACQUSITION OF WORLDLY GAIN OF POWER WHETHER
SUCH AN EXERCISE/BARGAIN COMPROMISES WITH THE
FUNDAMENTALS OF DEEN!
A MINUTE STUDY OF HISTORY REVEALS THAT THE MARTYDROMS
OF HADHRAT’S UMAR, UTHMAN, ALI (R.Z) AND HUSSAIN (R.A)
WERE THE CHAINS JEWS & MAGIANS. IN FACT THE FOUNDATION
OF SHIA RELIGION HAD BEEN LAID ONLY TO UPROOT ISLAM.
THE SHIAS HAVE PLAYED THEIR CUNNING BUT OBNOXIOUS ROLE
IN PROMOTING INTERNAL STRIFE AND WARFARE BETWEEN
UMMAYADDAS AND ABBASIDIES. THOSE WHO WERE TREACHEROUS
TO SALAHUDDIN AYUBBI WERE ALSO SHIAS. THESE VERY
PEOPLE PLAYED TRICKERY WITH THE TURKS AND WERE
INSTRUMENTAL IN PASSING RESOLUTION FOR THE ABOLITION
OF THE CALIPHATE IN TURKEY AND CONSEQUENTLY SULTAN
ABDUL HAMID WAS DISMISSED FROM HIS OFFICE. THEY ARE
ALSO GUILTY OF LAUNCHING THE MURDEROUS ATTACK ON
NOORUDDIN ZANGI, A SPIRITED MUSLIM RULER. MIR SADIQ
WHO CONSPIRED AGAINST AND GOT TIPU SULTAN MURDERED AND
MIR JAFFAR WHO SPIED AGAINST HIS MASTER, NAWAB
SIRAJUDDULLAH OWED THEIR ALLEGIANCE TO SHIA RAFIDA
RELIGION. THE SHIA FATIMIDIES IN NORTH AFRICA AND
EGYPT SUBJECTED AHLE-SUNNAH TO UNTOLD BRUTALITIES.
DURING THE REIGN OF ABBASIDES, OTHMANS, AND MOGHALS
THEY DID ALL IN THEIR POWER TO UNDERMINE ISLAM AND
MUSLIMS. THE NAWABS OF OUDH (INDIA) DID EVERYTHING TO
WRECK ISLAM. THEN HUSSAIN TABATABATANI SHOWED THE WAY
OF TURKISTAN AND IRAN TO TARTARS. IBN ALQAMI CAUSED
SUCH A MASSACRE OF MUSLIMS IN BAGHDAD (THROUGH THE
INVASION OF TARTARS) THAT TIGRIS WAS DYED RED WITH
BLOOD FOR SEVERAL DAYS AND LATER WHEN THE TREASURES OF
KNOWLEDGE WERE DUMPED IN THE RIVER IT BECAME ENTIRELY
BLACK BECAUSE OF THE INK OF BOOKS AND JOINED THE SEA
IN THIS VERY STATE. THE FATAMIDE GOVERNMENT OF EGYPT
BEHEADED EVERY SUCH MUSLIM WHO OPENED HIS TONGUE
AGAINST THE IMAMATE AND TRUSTEESHIP OF HADHRAT ALI
(R.A)
THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT OF IRAN IS PURSUING THIS VERY
POLICY; OF COURSE IN A SUBTLE WAY. ALL THE MUSLIMS
COUNTRIES SHOULD UNITEDLY ENDEAVOUR TO UNMASK IRAN AS
THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE SHIAS AND AHLE-SUNNAH ARE
TOO GRAVE AND GLARING. SHIAISM CANNOT BE RECONCILED
WITH THE IMAN TAUGHT AND COMMANDED BY RASUL–ALLAH .
THAT IMAN IS ENTIRELY AT VARIANCE WITH THE BRAND OF
ISLAM ADVOCATED BY KHOMENI. A STUDY OF SHIA RELIGION
WILL ITSELF REVEAL TO THE READERS HOW KHOMENISM IS FAR
FROM ISLAM. IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT EVERY MUSLIM BE MADE
AWARE OF THE BELIEFS AND TEACHINGS OF SHIAISM SO THAT
HE IS NOT MISLED BY THE SUPPORTERS OF THE SHIA CLERGY
WHO EXPECT THE UMMAH OF RASUL-ALLAH (SAW) TO UNITE
WITH THOSE WHOSE VERY RELIGION IS REARED ON HATRED FOR
THE SAHABAH. NO, THAT CAN NEVER COME TO PASS. THE
ENEMIES OF RASUL-ALLAH’S (SAW) SAHABAH CAN NEVER BE
THE FRIENDS AND BROTHERS OF THE AHLE-SUNNAH. THERE IS
NO COMPROMISE IN OUR FAITH FOR SUCH VENTURES. WE KNOW
OF NO DIPLOMACY AND RECOGNISE NO EXPEDIENCY FOR SUCH
VILE BROTHERHOOD. IF UNITY AND BROTHERHOOD WITH ALL
AND SUNDRY ARE OF SUCH IMPORTANCE LET THE SUPPORTERS
OF KHOMENI ADVOCATE UNITY AND BROTHERHOOD WITH BAHAISM
AND QADIANISM AS WELL.
THE SHIA CLERGY IS MERELY MISUSING THE NAME OF ISLAM
TO HOODWINK PEOPLE INTO BELIEVING THAT THEY HAVE ISLAM
AT HEART. BUT MEN WHO HAVE ISLAM AT HEART WILL FIRST
AND FOREMOST HAVE RASUL-ALLAH (SAW) AT HEART. IN THEIR
POLITICALLY MOTIVATED CONCEPT OF UNITY, THE PRODUCT OF
THE BANEFUL NAFS IN THE PURSUIT OF AGGRANDISEMENT AND
DOMINATION, THEY ARE PREPARED TO SHELVE THEIR
IMMEDIATE DESIGNS AND FABRICATE A COMMON BASIS AND A
WHICH CLUTTERS THEIR BOOKS AND PREACHINGS EXHIBIT
THEIR WICKEDNESS AND DETESTATION FOR THE ISLAM OF
RASUL–ALLAH
NOTWITHSTANDING ALL THIS IRAN TRUMPETS THE SLOGAN OF
“ISLAMIC REVOLUTION” VOCIFEROUSLY. KHOMENI IS AT PAINS
IN HIS ENDEAVOUR TO BEFOOL THE MUSLIM WORLD INTO THE
DECEPTION THAT IRAN IS AN ISLAMIC STATE MODELLED ALONG
THE QUR’ANIC LINES. BUT THIS CLAIM IS FOR FROM THE
TRUTH AS SHIAISM IS A DEVIATE AND BATIL SECT
SUSCRIBING TO MANY UN-ISLAMIC AND EVIL BELIEFS. THERE
IS, THEREFORE, NOTHING ISLAMIC IN THE EDIFIC RAISED BY
KHOMENI AND THE SHIA CLERGY AND IT SHOULD BE CLEAR TO
ALL AND SUNDRY THAT IRAN IS NO ISLAMIC STATE. IN FACT,
SHIA IRAN UNDER KHOMENI IS AS FAR FROM ISLAM OF
RASUL–ALLAH AS IT WAS UNDER THE REIGN OF FORMER SHAH.
BOTH ARE UN-ISLAMIC IN DIFFERENT GARB.
A TRULY ISLAMIC STATE IS POWERFUL AS IT RECEIVES
DIVINE BLESSINGS AND AID. THE REIGN OF KHULAFA
RASHIDEEN WHOM THE SHIAS BRAND AS MURTADS WAS BACKED
BY AID FROM ALLAH TA’ALA. IT WAS FOR THIS REASON THAT
ISLAM OVERRAN THE SO-CALLED “SUPERPOWERS” OF THOSE
DAYS AND ESTABLISHED ITS DOMAIN OVER THE GREATER PART
OF THE THEN KNOWN WORLD IN THE SHORTEST SPAN OF TIME.
INSPITE OF NUMERICAL AND MATERIAL INFERIORITY, AMIRUL
MUMINEEN HADHRAT UMAR (R.A), THE SECOND KHALIFAH OF
RASUL–ALLAH VANQUISHED BOTH ROMAN AND PERSIAN EMPIRES
AND BROUGHT THEIR LANDS UNDER ISLAMIC SWAY. THE DIVINE
AID IS THUS MANIFEST IN THE TRULY ISLAMIC STATE WHICH
KHULAFA RASHIDEEN ESTABLISHED. BUT THE CONDITION OF
SHIA IRAN IS LAMENTABLE. FOR YEARS NOW IT IS LOCKED IN
A MUSLIM COUNTRIES. IRAN LAUNCHES ONE POERATION AFTER
ANOTHER AGAINST IRAQ. WAVES UPON WAVES OF FIDAYEEN ARE
SENT ON SUICIDAL MISSION AGAINST IRAQ BUT THE POSITION
REMAINS UNCHANGED. THERE IS NO PROGRESS IN IRAN’S
“JIHAD” AGAINST “KUFR”. THIS SEEMS TO BE MOST SHAMEFUL
FOR A COUNTRY WHICH MAKES LOUD PROCLAIMATIONS ABOUT
EXPORTING ITS BRAND OF “ISLAMIC REVOLUTION.” INDEED
THE ISLAMIC SLOGANS OF IRAN ARE A MOCKERY.
IF IRAN WAS A TRULY ISLAMIC STATE, IT WOULD HAVE PEACE
WITH IRAQ AS THE LATTER HAD ACCEPTED THE PEACE
PROPOSALS OF O.I.C. AND OTHER ISLAMIC BODIES BUT THE
IRAN — IRAQ WAR AND RESULTANT BLOODSHED HAS NOT COME
TO AN END DUE TO THE UNREALISTIC AND UNCOMPROMISING
STAND TAKEN BY THE HIGH PRIESTS OF IRAN.
IT IS A SINGULAR AND REMARKABLE DISTINCTION OF ISLAM
THAT 96 PER CENT OF ITS FOLLOWERS ARE IN THE FOLD OF
SUNNAT-WL-JAMAAT WITH FOUR PER CENT FOLLOWING VARIOUS
SHIA PROCLIVITIES SUCH AS ISNA ASHRI, ISMAILI, ZAIDI,
ALAWI, DARUZI ETC. THE REASON FOR THIS UNANIMITY AND
OVER-WHELMING CONSENSUS IN ISLAM IS THAT ISLAMIC
TEACHINGS ARE PLAIN, SIMPLE AND EXPLICIT NOT LENDING
THEMSELVES TO MORE THAN ONE INTERPRETATION ON THE
BASIC ISSUES OF IDEOLOGY AND ACTIVITY. ALMIGHTY ALLAH
DECLARES IN THE QURAN :
“WHO SO FOLLOW THE MY GUIDANCE, THERE SHALL NO FEAR
COME UPON THEM NEITHER SHALL THEY GRIEVE. BUT THEY WHO
DISBELIEVE AND DENY OUR REVELATIONS, SUCH ARE RIGHTFUL
OWNERS OF THE FIVE. THEY WILL ABIDE THEREIN”.
(2:38-39).
“AND IF THEY ANSWER THEE NOT, THEN KNOW THAT WHAT THEY
FOLLOW IS THEIR LUSTS. AND WHO GOETH FARTHER ASTRAY
THAN HE WHO FOLLOWE THE HIS LUST WITHOUT GUIDANCE FROM
ALLAH. LOT ALLAH GUIDETH NOT WRONGDOING FOLK”. (28 :
50).
“HOST THOU SEEN HIM WHO MAKETH HIS DESIRE HIS GOD, AND
ALLAH SENDETH HIM ASTRAY PURPOSELY, AND SEALE THE UP
HIS HEARING AND HIS HEART, AND SETTETH ON HIS SIGHT A
COVERING ? THEN WHO WILL LEAD HIM AFTER ALLAH (HATH
CONDEMNED HIM)? WILL YE NOT THEN HEED?” (55:23).
“IS HE WHO RELIETH ON A CLEAR PROOF FROM HIS LORD LIKE
THOSE FRO WHOM THE EVIL THAT THEY DO IS BEAUTIFIED
WHILE THEY FOLLOW THEIR OOWN LUSTS?” (47:14).
NOTES:
1. SUNNI MUSLIM CONSTITUTE 96% OF THE TOTAL WORLD
MUSLIM POPULATION——–BY ABU NAEEM ISPAHANI, P. 4)
WHILE THE SHIAS ARE ONLY REMAINING 4% OR EVEN LESS.
THIS MEANS THAT OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF SUNNI MUSLIMS
HAVE CONDEMNED TO HELL BY THE SHIAS WHOSE CREDENTIALS
ARE THEM SELVES FAKE AND FORGET !
2. THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THIS VERSE IS “O
MESSENGER ! MAKE KNOWN THAT WHICH HATH BEEN REVEALED
UNTO THEE FROM THY LORD, FOR IT THOU DO IT NOT, THOU
WILL NOT HAVE CONVEYED HIS MESSAGE. ALLAH WILL PROTECT
THEE FROM MANKIND. LOT ALLAH GUIDETH NOT THE
DISBELIEVING FOLK.” (AL-QUR’AN 5:67).
3. THIS IS A GREAT SLUR ON THE PROPHETIC MISSION !
4. THE FACT IS THAT THERE WERE NO SUCH DIFFERENCES OR
GROUPING AMONG THE SAHABAH OF RASUL-ALLAH . THE QUR’AN
HAS DESCRIBED THEIR STATE OF MIND IN THESE
WORDS………..:THE CMPANIONS OF MUHAMMAD ARE HARD
AGAINST THE DISBELIEVERS AND MERCIFUL AMONG
THEMSELVES.” (48:29). AT ANOTHER PLACE IN THE QUR’AN
IT IS STATED ABOUT THEM:——- “ALLAH HATE ATTUNED
THE HEARTS OF THE BELIEVERS.” (8:63). AND HISTORY
BEARSWITNESS, EVEN NON-MUSLIM HISTORIANS TESTIFY THIS
THAT THERE WERE NO FIFFERENCES AMONG THE SAHABAH AND
NEITHER THERE WERE ANY REVALRIES CALLING FOR
GROUPINGS. THE PICTURE DRAWN BY KHOMENI IS ABSOLUTELY
ABSURD.
5. PLEASE SEE APPENDIX–11 :HADHART ABU BAKR SIDDIQ AS
HADHRAT ALI SAW HIM” AND ANNEX–111 “ELECTION OF
CALIPHS AND JEWISH BACKGOUND TO THE BATTLES OF JAMAL &
SIFFIN” BY DR. MUHAMMAD HAMIDULLAH OF PARIS. SIMILARLY
ALL SHIA STORIES ABOUT HADHRAT UMAR’S ENEMITY WITH
HADHRAT ALI OR ALLEGED EXCESSES BY HADHRAT UMAR ON
HADHRAT FATIMAH (R.A) ARE WITHOUT UMAR. IN FACT BY
GIVING HIS DAUGHTER, UMM KULSUM, IN MARRIAGE TO
HADHRAT UMAR, HADHRAT ALI MADE HIM HIS SON-IN-LAW IN
THE SAME WAY RASUL-ALLAH (SAW) MADE HADHRAT ALI HIS
SON-IN-LAW BY GIVING HER DAUGHTER, FATIMA, IN
MARRIAGE. IT IS A DIVINE BLESSING THAT BY ESTABLISHING
BLOOD RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HADHRAT ALI AND UMAR, THE
WHOLE BUILDING OF HATRED AND RANCOUR BUILT BY THE
SHIAS AGAINST THE ALLEGED DENIGRATORS OF AHLE-BAIT
HAVE CRUMBLED LIKE THE HOUSE OF CARDS.
6. KHOMENI IN HIS PERSIAN BOOK (VIDE PAGES 113-114)
HAS USED SUCH STRONG WORDS OF CENSURE AGAINST THE
SAHABAH AND ESPECIALLY THE FIRST THREE CALIPHS
HADHRAT’S ABU BAKR, UMAR AND USMAN (R.A) WHICH CAN
ONLY SUIT SOME UTTERLY IRRELIGIONS AND BAD CHARACTER
PEOPLE OF AN UNDERGROUND TREACHEROUS ORGANISATION.
AFTER READING KHOMENI OR OTHER SHIA WRITERS, A
WESTERNER CAN WELL REALISE THAT AFTER THE DEMISE OF
THE PROPHET OF ISLAM ONLY FOUR OF FIVE OF HIS
FOLLOWERS STUCK TO THE THINK OF ACCEPTING ISLAM WHEN
ITS EARLY VOTARIES PRESENT SUCH A DISMAL PICTURE?
ISLAM HAS RECEIVED A SEVERE SET-BACK IN THE WEST DUE
TO SHIA INSINUATIONS!
7. MORE THEN 10 MILLION MUSLIMS WERE MASSACRED IN COLD
BLOOD DUE TO THE TREACHERY OF SHIAS. FOR FURTHER
DETAILS ABOUT THIS HEART – READING ACCOUNT PLEASE SEE
. “REALITY OF SHIA RELIGION” BY HAKIM FAIZ ALAM
SIDDIQUI (p.11).
@Mr. Farooq Hussaini
Aap nai tou shiaoon ki aur karbal ki haqiqat di, kia aap mujah ye sab urdu mai provide kar saktay hain. because my english is not so good.
i m a suni girl read the article i just want to say that the writer did not provide the prooves from any hadith or Quran where as whenver shia talk about this incident they always give references from ahadith n Quran.
well i agree with ayesha the first and foremost thing before talking about such sensitive issue especially related to Islam, needs references from Quran and Hades and without that nobody is allowed to say even a single word and Mr. writer go and wash your beautiful face then try to miss guide people with your fake stories.
@ayesha @ awish
I think both of you did not gone through the article, because there are plenty of authentic refrences are available. A reference of Bukhari I also like to quote here;
Hazrat Ume Haram narated that Muhammad SAL was resting at his home and he wakp up and said that he saw a dream that an Islamic naval force is going to attack the capital of Rome “Questuntunia” now days Istambole, Prophet SAL said all the soldiers who participate in that mission are bought Janah by participating in such Jahad.
It is also very much available in the Bukhari and others authentic books of hadith that that navel attack on Questuntunia was done in the regime of Hazrat Ameer Mavia R.A and the Yazeed bin Mavia was the Commander of the Jahad and Hazrat Hassan R.A and Hazrat Hussain were also participated in it.
Moreover, Hose of Prophet Hazrat Abu Ayub Ansari was 80 years old when the Jahad was done and he wished that i also like to participate in this jahad because i heard that Muahmmad SAL confirmed the janah for all participants of this Jahad so i also like to participate in it, he also advised that if i died on the way i may be burried neareast to Qustuntunia. and he died and the commander Yazeed bin Mavia himself did the grave of Hazrat Abu Ayub Ansari R.A and burried him. and a stone on his grave is still fixed wherein it is also mentioned that yazeed bin Mavia burried him.
It is intresting that Shia themself accepted that Yazeed Bin Mavia participated in the Jahad but he was not commander and was simply a soldier.
Even he was a soldier he is a Janati according to Rasool SAL hadith. then how a janati man be a so aggrasive and dare to kill grand son of Prophet. SAL.
Now on one side a Hadith of bukhari and other side a baised and febricated history, which we have to accept fake history or Hadith of Muhammad SAL ?
I refer you two books on the topic above, Inshalah you will give very good knowledge and these books are also available on Internet “Scribd”
1. Khalifat Mavia o Yazeed by Mehmood Ahmad Abbasi
2. Tehqeeq Mazeed ba Silsila Khalifat Mavia o Yazeed by Mehmood Ahmad Abbasi.
I hope you will go through it if you want to know the authentic refrences and real background of karbala.
Aoa, dudes, i dnt knw much abt histry.shias may be rite.sunis may b rite.bt dats nt da isue rite nw.ppl kil us cz v r muslims.vithot knwing dat day r kiling eithr a shia or a suni or a whabi,vatever.day even dnt kare vether v r gud muslims or nt,vethr v folow islam or nt.v r kild bcz v hv a muslim name,n dats it.so fellows try 2 b a saimply a muslim.
Man,our religion is a religion of peace.v hate nobody.our prophet orderd not 2 murder evn a single non muslim,dan how could v kil our own bros n sisterz.
MAN,v al vana go 2 heavens.every human is creatd by ALAH.SO he loves every1,me,u,every muslim,jew,christian,hindu,animals,plants,man evrything.
can any1 hate hz own creation,certianiy not.he loves us al n xpekts da same 4rm us.
So my friends,wake up.otherwise v al r on our ways 2 hell….think abt it|
@ adil bhutta
I appreciate your views, but you may advice the shias who are engaged in abusing the companions of prophet PBUH, these are the companions who got the certificate of junah by Allah, and Quran uncountless times appreciated the companions of prophet PBUH, and declared the Ideal people.
But unfortunately shias speakers all the time in their speaches
We do not know much abt of our books like muslim and bukhary books
there are much things which will shock boths of muslims (like shia and suni)
Shia will laugh on sunni and sunni will shame theimselves but other hands
there are many stories abt shias, which are wrong presented bcos of shias
Bad ulmah. by the way i am sunni,
but there was not any sunni befor 1500 year ago but quran say abt shia
shia mean campanion for tip )
@ kobman
u said very correct that u have not much knowledge of bukhar and muslim, i like to add that you have no knowledge even basic knowledge of Islam, as you stated that u are sunni, it is well but as you quoted that there was no sunni 1500 years back but quran said about shias.
but my dear friend you dont know the meaning of shia which used in Quran:
In Quran Allah condemed people ” who become shia” so shia is the certificate of fitna pardazi, not the quality.
I hope u will go through the verse of quran where word shia used, if not possible for you, then consult to the imam of your nearest mosque. inshallah you will never speak like today.
ye sab bat shia ke dwara likhit hai….. isiliye isme koi v sachhai.. ye savi ghatnayen kalpnik hain…..
I never understood the incidents of karbala before till i read this article. i have read without being biased to any sect. my personal belief is that it appears logical. this will serve asa platform forall readers to read more and come out with the true facts. may allah guide all of us to understand the truth and unite all of us for the cause of his deen.
I think we should get guidance from our history. Yazeed was not even a sahabi. So i think it is big stupidity if anybody want to suppot yazeed against Hussain. The write of this blog is big stupid as he is creating hatered amongst the muslim for a man(yazeed) for which all the muslims are agreed that yazeed was zalim and killer of the family of the prophet.
I want to ask one simple question, does this blog is going to add anyting in sawab of the writer as he is supporting yazeed and trying to creat differences between muslims.
I think this is the time to get guidance from karbala to make our future goals as one muslim ummah. Karbala added a lot of good effects n muslims. I think karbala incident gave the courage to muslims to fight against any zulm.
Now the jewish people are so tense and that due to effect ofkarbala, muslims are so strong that they can fight with any poweras iran appeared to be state against ther illigitimate country (Israel). There are many other exmples who are figting with so called powers because they are impressed from karbala like Hamad and Hezb ullah.
So i think people like author of this article should be rejected by the muslims as they are paid by anti islam lobby.
May Allah forgive us ad unite us.
Wasalam.
SHAME ON YOU. YOU ZIONIST PUPPETS AND FABRICATORS. THER IS NO DISPUTE ON THE ISSUE OF KARBALA B/W SHIAHS AND SUNNIS. YOU ARE THE FABRICATOR AND ALLAH SWT, YOUR LIMBS, AND THE KIRAMAN KATEBEEN ARE WITNESSES GAINST YOU… AND SO IS HISTORY BOTH DOCUMENTED AND UNDOCUMENTED.
We, the Shia has nothing to be worried by your stupid comments. Whatever you have written about Imam Hassan and Muwavia is totally wrong, read books first and stop fabricating the situations and circustances.If you can say R to Muwavia everything is expected from you…anyways you are only glorifying your own linage through Abu Sufyan…LOLOL
Even, I like Ayesha’s comment above…
We Shia dont disrespect any sahabi but have utmost respect for Ahle-Bait, for whom there are numerous verses in Quran and hadiths, so we are close to them…even, Bibi Ayesha was killed by Muwavia…this is the way u people respect Prophet’s (PBUH) wife…shame on you people…
I will request all my shia-sunni brothers & sisters to take a side from this type of YAZIDI mullahs (MOULANA MOHD. AKRA). They are launched by the Govt. of Saudia (which is WAHABI). They have the mission to create disputes between shia/sunni , to weak them and to take control on them and to provoke their WAHABIASM. So I’ll request both shia/sunni communities to receite LANAT on them. They are making suicide bombs in so many imam bargahs and juloos.
They make suicide attacks in sunni saints graves (data darbar bomb explosion) is one big example.
So be aware of them and take care of yourself and kick them out of the society.
ALLAH KI LANAT , MUAWIA PAR AUR US KE PAROKAR WAHABION PAR (AMEEN)
You will find so many things while reading this najas mulla article that his grand father YAZEED (lanat allah) was guilty by facing imam family and YAZEED (lanat allah) served imam remaining family with very kindness and provide them shelter and every thing.
All his discussion shows that his moulvi is the big VAKEEL of Yazeed. May be his family tree is from YAZEED thats why he is protecting yazeed (representing wahabi thought). Other wise no sunni can think or imagine this bull shit.
Ist Allah Almighty guide them , other wise destroy all of them at one time.
They are NASOOR on this earth and creating nasoor all around the earth.
The writer tryied to put historical fact but one should check the reference book
properly whether it is true or false or the writer is manuplating the fact.There is no harm to do justice with any one even Yazed ,if hisorical fact is there.The writer has raised some valid point like the topography of that area and the evidence that both brothers Imam Hassan(Rau) and Imam Hussain(rau)never complained against Amir Muawiya.As a student of history i know there is not a single historical evidence where Yazid instructed his army to attack Imam Hussain(Rau) or conspire to kill him but another fact is also there that he didnot punished the culprits.
The writer has not done justice with Shiaas.In Some places it shows the writer is enemy of Shiaas and this article is not to bring the truth but to condem Shias
The example of these Shias according to a poet is:
MATUM HAI USI KA JIAY KHUD QATAK KIA.
These Shias are the murdrer of the Grand son of Prophet MUhammad PBUH and his family, neither there was any conflict among the Banu Ummayah and Banu Hashim nor the Tele of Karbala which repeated from centuries by these shias is based on facts. It is simply false and febricated.
Wonderful article, the author explore the reality very well in brief. Yahi wou Sazish hai jo Nawasa e Rasool k Khilaf uss waqt k shias nai ki thee, aur ajj be un hi shiaon k pero kar dynia mai bud ammni phala rahay hain